Apple Calls Musk’s AI Lawsuit “Absurd” And Seeks Dismissal
Learn why Musk’s lawsuit against Apple could set a precedent for AI industry standards and fair competition.
Key Takeaways:
- Start of the Dispute: Musk Accuses Apple of Unfair Practices: Elon Musk’s xAI lawsuit against Apple alleges manipulation of AI rankings and demands equal treatment for all chatbot providers, claiming Apple favors OpenAI.
- Apple’s Defense: Denying Wrongdoing and Emphasizing Fair Competition: Apple denies any antitrust violations, stating partnerships are based on quality and privacy, and that its AI technology is developed independently without exclusive agreements.
- Contradictions in Musk’s Claims: Internal Record and Counterexamples: Musk’s own actions, like algorithm changes and conflicting statements from his chatbot Grok, undermine his accusations, while success stories of competitors highlight a competitive AI market.
- Significance of the Case: Potential Impact on AI Industry and Regulations: The lawsuit could set a precedent for how tech companies collaborate with AI firms, influencing future legal and industry standards on competition and innovation.
- Current Status and Broader Implications: Industry-Wide Debate on AI Partnerships: Awaiting a judge’s ruling, the case raises important questions about applying traditional laws to AI and balancing innovation with fair competition.
Apple and Elon Musk are locked in a legal fight that shows just how heated the AI race has become. Musk’s company X Corp, which also runs his AI startup xAI, is suing Apple for billions. He claims the iPhone maker unfairly favors OpenAI and that Apple’s use of ChatGPT in Apple Intelligence breaks antitrust law. Musk even argues Apple has a legal obligation to strike a deal with xAI. Apple’s lawyers have now asked a judge to throw the case out, calling the entire claim “patently absurd.”
How The Dispute Started
The battle began when Musk accused Apple of manipulating App Store AI rankings to keep OpenAI at the top. He called it a clear antitrust violation. Soon after, xAI filed a lawsuit that went further, arguing Apple cannot partner with OpenAI without offering equal treatment to all chatbot providers, including xAI. Musk also floated the idea that Apple’s AI features may infringe on his intellectual property, widening the scope of his claims.
Apple’s Response
Apple denies any wrongdoing and says Musk’s arguments have no legal basis. In its filing, Apple stressed that antitrust law does not force companies to partner with every competitor, especially without considering quality, privacy, and security. The company also pointed out that it intends to work with multiple AI partners in the future, and that its collaboration with OpenAI is not exclusive. Apple called Musk’s intellectual property concerns equally baseless, emphasizing its AI technology was built independently.
Contradictions Around Musk
Musk’s case has also been undermined by his own record. Reports show he previously directed changes to X’s algorithm to amplify his own posts, raising questions about his accusations of unfair competition. Even his own Grok chatbot contradicted his Apple lawsuit claims, siding with OpenAI’s Sam Altman. On top of that, AI apps like DeepSeek and Perplexity have reached top spots in the App Store, showing that OpenAI is not the only player finding success there.
Why This Case Matters
While the case is still waiting for a ruling, it could set a major precedent for how tech giants work with AI companies. If dismissed, it would reinforce Apple’s stance that partnerships can be selective and based on quality. If it moves forward, it could open the door to more lawsuits where companies claim entitlement to partnerships, potentially slowing AI innovation. Beyond this, the fight highlights bigger questions about AI: how to apply old antitrust and patent laws to fast-moving technology, and how to balance innovation with fair competition and ethical use.
The judge’s decision in the coming weeks will decide whether Musk’s lawsuit goes anywhere or stops here, but it has already sparked an industry-wide debate about the future of AI partnerships.


